When it comes to sexual acts, there are a number of options. However , which love-making position does the best task of delivering an orgasmic pleasure? The answers vary with regards to the man and woman.

Some sex positions are better for certain https://www.psypost.org/2018/01/study-men-women-view-mixed-race-male-faces-attractive-white-faces-50614 times of from. A day sex appointment is likely to be best suited for the couch hug position. It enables https://besthookupsites.org/fling-com-review/ the man to savor a few smooches, while the woman will take it convenient on her thighs.


The doggy design is a basic sex spot for men, allowing them to indulge in some deep penetration and caring access. Its no secret that men choose to have a little bit control over their partner.

A second sex situation is the area lying situation, which allows for some serious body touching. Also, it is a great way to heat up after a prolonged date.

There are numerous sex positions for men that may prove to be even more entertaining than others. However , the missionary position is by far the least visually stimulating.

Applying an appropriate lubricant can make a big difference in the male climax process. Additionally, it increases the awareness from the penis. With a bit of learning from your errors, you can find the right lubricant for you as well as your partner.

If you are looking with respect to something a lot more adventurous, you might want to try out the standing up love-making position. You can try out this making love trick at home, at the office or perhaps at a party.

Work Group

Objective Enactive
This online lecture-demonstration unfolds the term ´Poetic Materiality´ within the context of designing and choreographing with Somatic Costumes. Through critiquing and applying the somatic practice of Skinner Releasing Technique, the poetics of philosopher Gaston Bachelard and the materiality of anthropologist Tim Ingold, this talk begins to map poetic and material agencies between bodies-costumes within the design-performance encounter.

Artist Talk

Objective Enactive

This talk will focus on the first outcome of Glitsch(ening) Ci(rculari)ty, a tripartite site-specific, where I am pursuing a speculative exploration of the ecology of the city, between the urban and the biological, unfolding its layers and materiality of time. The talk will end in a conversation between fellow researchers and artists in the collaborative project Urban Ecologies, where Glitsch(ening) Ci(rculari)ty, is generated from.


Polyvocal Tongue The presentation will focus on relational ethics and polyvocality in performative text. It will also explore the use of plural languages in a play, looking at how a polylingual praxis can open up new aesthetic potential in playwrighting and in artistic research in general.


TRANSPOSITIONS— JAR, Mette Edvardsen and modular diaries At the start, the idea for an artistic research conversation with Mette Edvardsen did not spring out of the topics shortlisted for the conference—hospitality, vulnerability and care—but a book that she had co-edited, and dropped in my shelf.

Panel Discussion

The Ethics of Vulnerability and Artistic Research

Any ethical framework must take account of the vulnerability of the human condition. This is significant in all creative endeavours – especially in artistic practice and the teaching of it – since the very act of creating something and putting it out into the world is an expression of vulnerability.